{"id":5,"date":"2008-03-06T01:07:39","date_gmt":"2008-03-06T09:07:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.deaneckles.com\/blog\/?p=5"},"modified":"2010-04-20T12:32:30","modified_gmt":"2010-04-20T20:32:30","slug":"definitions-of-unconscious-processing-in-psychology-awareness-explanation-and-identity-conditions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.deaneckles.com\/blog\/5_definitions-of-unconscious-processing-in-psychology-awareness-explanation-and-identity-conditions\/","title":{"rendered":"Definitions of unconscious processing in cognitive and social psychology"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.yale.edu\/psychology\/FacInfo\/Bargh.html\">John Bargh<\/a>, Professor of Psychology at Yale, and his <a href=\"http:\/\/pantheon.yale.edu\/%7Ejab257\/home.html\">ACME (Automaticity in Cognition, Motivation, and Emotion) Lab<\/a> are doing very exciting work.  I had read some articles by Bargh some time ago (e.g. Bargh &amp; McKenna 2004) and encountered his work in the context of debates about how objects can automatically activate attitudes that apply to them.  But it hasn&#8217;t been until recently (following a discussion with <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cipert.org\/?faculty\/bio&amp;id=breckenridge\">James Breckenridge<\/a>) that I&#8217;ve begun to really engage with the larger body of research Bargh and his collaborators have produced &#8212; and the interesting reflections and arguments found in the reviews of this and related work that he and his collaborators have written.<\/p>\n<p>I expect I&#8217;ll be writing more about this work, but in this and some follow-up posts I want to just say a little bit about the general character of the research and, more specifically, <strong>how this work engages with and employs definitions of &#8216;unconscious&#8217; and &#8216;unconscious processing<\/strong>&#8216;.<\/p>\n<p>Bargh &amp; Morsella (2008, in press, page numbers are to <a href=\"http:\/\/pantheon.yale.edu\/~jab257\/Bargh_Morsella_Unconscious_Mind.pdf\">this version<\/a>) highlights how cognitive psychology and social psychology have operated with different definitions and different emphasis in investigating what they call &#8220;unconscious&#8221;.  For cognitive psychology, &#8220;subliminal information processing \u2013 [&#8230;] extracting meaning from stimuli of which one is not consciously aware&#8221; \u2013 has been paradigmatic of the unconscious (p. 1). That is, its study of unconscious processing is the study of the processing of <em>stimuli <\/em>of which one is unaware.  On the other hand, for mainstream social psychology research, including work with priming, &#8220;the traditional focus has been on mental processes of which the individual is unaware, not on stimuli of which one is unaware&#8221; (<em>Ibid<\/em>.).<\/p>\n<p>This is a striking difference that, as Bargh &amp; Morsella illustrate, has consequences for how &#8220;dumb&#8221; or &#8220;smart&#8221; and &#8220;limited&#8221; or &#8220;pervasive&#8221; unconscious processing is. If unconscious processing is limited to processing of subliminal stimuli, then it doesn&#8217;t have much to go on. But the social psychology definition &#8212; the liberal, process-awareness definition &#8212; allows us to call a lot more things unconscious processing.<\/p>\n<p>I recognize shortcomings with the cognitive psychology definition &#8212; the narrow, stimulus-awareness definition. And Bargh and Morsella&#8217;s statement of the process-awareness definition does enable them to say some striking things (e.g. about automatic activation of motivations).<\/p>\n<p>But I also wonder whether this redefined term can bear much theoretical weight.  Specifically, I have two concerns:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>this definition makes what is unconscious depend on each person&#8217;s knowledge of the causes of their actions &#8212; and this can get tricky in unintuitive and highly individual ways<\/li>\n<li>this definition seems to count on having good identity conditions for the kinds of objects to which &#8216;unconscious&#8217; is supposed to apply (e.g. events, processes), but identity conditions (which are often hard to come by in general) are tricky for this domain in particular.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>These are familiar problems in philosophy of mind, and they deserve consideration when designing theoretically useful definitions of unconscious processing. I aim to take up each of these issues in more detail in another post.<\/p>\n<div class=\"references\">\nBargh, J.A., &amp; Morsella, E. (2008, in press). <a href=\"http:\/\/pantheon.yale.edu\/~jab257\/Bargh_Morsella_Unconscious_Mind.pdf\">The unconscious mind<\/a>. <em>Perspectives on Psychological Science<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Bargh, J.A., &amp; McKenna, K.Y.A. (2004). The Internet and social life. <em>Annual review of psychology, 55<\/em>, 573-590.<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>John Bargh, Professor of Psychology at Yale, and his ACME (Automaticity in Cognition, Motivation, and Emotion) Lab are doing very exciting work. I had read some articles by Bargh some time ago (e.g. Bargh &amp; McKenna 2004) and encountered his work in the context of debates about how objects can automatically activate attitudes that apply [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[29,32,3,31,14,30],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-automaticity","category-identity-conditions","category-philosophy","category-priming","category-psychology","category-unconscious"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.deaneckles.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.deaneckles.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.deaneckles.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.deaneckles.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.deaneckles.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/www.deaneckles.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":304,"href":"http:\/\/www.deaneckles.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5\/revisions\/304"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.deaneckles.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.deaneckles.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.deaneckles.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}