{"id":305,"date":"2010-04-26T18:25:41","date_gmt":"2010-04-27T02:25:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.deaneckles.com\/blog\/?p=305"},"modified":"2010-04-26T21:35:02","modified_gmt":"2010-04-27T05:35:02","slug":"aardvarks-use-of-wizard-of-oz-prototyping-to-design-their-social-interfaces","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.deaneckles.com\/blog\/305_aardvarks-use-of-wizard-of-oz-prototyping-to-design-their-social-interfaces\/","title":{"rendered":"Aardvark’s use of Wizard of Oz prototyping to design their social interfaces"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Wall Street Journal’s Venture Capital Dispatch reports<\/a> on how Aardvark<\/a>, the social question asking and answering service recently acquired by Google, used a Wizard of Oz prototype<\/a> to learn about how their service concept would work without building all the tech before knowing if it was any good.<\/p>\n

Aardvark employees would get the questions from beta test users and route them to users who were online and would have the answer to the question. This was done to test out the concept before the company spent the time and money to build it, said Damon Horowitz, co-founder of Aardvark, who spoke at Startup Lessons Learned, a conference in San Francisco on Friday.<\/p>\n

\u201cIf people like this in super crappy form, then this is worth building, because they\u2019ll like it even more,\u201d Horowitz said of their initial idea.<\/p>\n

At the same time it was testing a \u201cfake\u201d product powered by humans, the company started building the automated product to replace humans. While it used humans \u201cbehind the curtain,\u201d it gained the benefit of learning from all the questions, including how to route the questions and the entire process with users.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

This is a really good idea, as I’ve argued before on this blog<\/a> and in a chapter for developers of mobile health interventions<\/a>. What better way to (a) learn about how people will use and experience your service and (b) get training data for your machine learning system than to have humans-in-the-loop run the service?<\/p>\n

My friend Chris Streeter<\/a> wondered whether this was all done by Aardvark employees or whether workers on Amazon Mechanical Turk may have also been involved, especially in identifying the expertise of the early users of the service so that the employees could route the questions to the right place. I think this highlights how different parts of a service can draw on human and non-human intelligence in a variety of ways — via a micro-labor market, using skilled employees who will gain hands-on experience with customers, etc.<\/p>\n

I also wonder what UIs the humans-in-the-loop used to accomplish this. It’d be great to get a peak. I’d expect that these were certainly rough around the edges, as was the Aardvark customer-facing UI.<\/p>\n

Aardvark does a good job of being a quite sociable agent (e.g., when using it via instant messaging) that also gets out of the way of the human–human interaction between question askers and answers. I wonder how the language used by humans to coordinate and hand-off questions may have played into creating a positive para-social interaction with vark.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Wall Street Journal’s Venture Capital Dispatch reports on how Aardvark, the social question asking and answering service recently acquired by Google, used a Wizard of Oz prototype to learn about how their service concept would work without building all the tech before knowing if it was any good. Aardvark employees would get the questions […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[44,26,57,15,66,78,59,47,56,13,75,54,9,65,7,81],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-305","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-communication","category-data-collection","category-design","category-hci","category-information-needs","category-markets","category-mechanical-turk","category-needfinding","category-prototyping","category-research-methods","category-search","category-social-responses-to-communication-technologies","category-social-software","category-source-orientation","category-usability","category-wizard-of-oz"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.deaneckles.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/305","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.deaneckles.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.deaneckles.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.deaneckles.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.deaneckles.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=305"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/www.deaneckles.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/305\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":316,"href":"https:\/\/www.deaneckles.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/305\/revisions\/316"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.deaneckles.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=305"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.deaneckles.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=305"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.deaneckles.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=305"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}